(*»
PROJECT
TITLE;
Studies
on
alternate
cereal
crops,
speltz
and
triticales:
crop
yields
and
quality.
1988.
PROJECT
-
LEADERS»
G.F.
Stallknechr
R.A.
Larson
PROJECT
COOPERATOR;
Darrell
Wesenberg,
USDA-ARS,
Aberdeen,
ID
PROJECT
LOCATION;
OBJECTIVES;
MSU
-
Southern
Ag.
Research
Center,
Huntley,
MT
59037
The
primary
objective
was
to
evaluate
crops
which
could
be
used
for
non-compliance
cropping
managements.
Considerations
are
also
being
given
to
production
costs,
feasibility
of
utilization
for
grain
production.
To
evaluate
speltz
and
triticale
varieties
and
selections
for
maximum
yield
and
quality
(protein).
SUMMARY
AND
RESULTS;
5
total
ot
10
separate
trials
on
alternate
cereal
crops,
8
dryland
and
two
irrigated
were
conducted
at
SARC
in
1988.
The
dryland
trials
consisted
of
winter
barley,
spring
and
winter
speltz,
and
spring
and
winter
triticales,
and
soft
white
winter
wheat.
Due
to
the
drought
conditions,
the
yields
of
trials
were
quite
low,
and
we
will
present
data
on
2
of
the
dryland
trials.
Irrigated
dwarf
oat
trial;
Several
promising
dwarf
oat
varieties
were
compared
to
Monlda
and
Otana
for
yield
and
test
weight.
The
results
show
that
the
dwarf
oat
selections
produced
yields
and
test
weights
equal
to
a
greater
than
the
check
varieties.
The
advantage
of
the
dwarf
varieties
is
that
they
will
not
lodge
under
irrigation
management.
Irrigated
spring
triticale
trial;
PLEASE
data
are
given
in
CwT/Acre.
Thirteen
triticalt
NOTE
the
yield
e
varieties
were
compared
to
Newana
spring
wheat
(used
as
a
check
variety).
With
the
exception
of
two
varieties
(which
were
later
found
to
be
winter
types)
the
triticale
selections
yielded
equal
to
the
spring
wheat
check
with
slightly
lower
test
weights
(typical
of
triticale)
and
maturity
dates.
Many
of
the
triticale
selections
were^
significantly
taller
than
Newana,
which
could
result
in
lodging
problems.
However,
most
triticale
selections
appeared
to
have
exceptional
strong
straw
strength.
Soft
white
winter
wheat,
dryland;
Data
are
given
in
table
3.
Results
show
that
under
drought
^conditions
several
of
the
soft
white
winter
wheats
out
yielded
the
hard
red
winter
wheat
varieties,
eg
Tiber
and
Neely,
and
produced
yields
equal
to
Redwin.
Winter
barley^
dryland;
All
winter
barley
varieties
produced
lower
yields
than
the
hard
red
winter
wheat
check.
Rocky.
Also,
a
consistant
problem
with
the
winter
barley
selections
presently
available
are
the
low
test
weights,
which
are
often
rejected
by
the
cattle
feeder
industry.
(*»
TABLE
1
.
198d
IRRIGATED
SEMI-DWARF
OAT
VARIETY
TRIAL
-SARC,
HUNTLEY.
VARIETY
YIELD
TESTWT
PLANTHT
HEAD
BU/AC
LB/BU
INCHES
DATE
r*)
83AB3250
83AB3119
CIA83126
84AB838
82AB1359
82AB1142
81AB5792
82AB1178
82AB1402
83AB3725
84AB1466
CI
9252
82AB3250
83AB3119
MONIDA
(
84AB838
82AB1359
82AB1142
81AB5792
82AB1178
82AB1402
83AB3725
84AB1466
OTAKA
(SD)
(SD)
ID
75
(SD)
(SD)
(SD)
(SD)
(SD)
(SD)
(SD)
(SD)
146
133
130
125
122
121
23
29
87
40
58
75
118.98
116.40
113.65
108.84
106.07
104.27
34.87
35.33
35.90
36.13
35.63
36.17
36.93
37.63
33.77
36.20
33.23
36.03
24.00
24.00
30.00
25.00
21.67
22.33
23.33
24.00
22.33
25.33
20.67
29.67
163.67
163.00
163.00
161.33
165.67
162.67
161.33
162.00
164.67
163.33
156.00
164.00
STATISTICAL
TABLE:
EXPERIMENTAL
MEANS
120.69
35.65
24.36
162.56
rp
REP.
MEAN
SQUARE
458.70
.09
4.69
.19
VAR.
MEAN
SQUARE
446.25
4.55
25.06
17.66
ERROR
MEAN
SQUARE
75.51
1.87
2.42
.38
p^
ERROR
DEGREES
OF
FREEDOM
22.00
22.00
22.00
22.00
F
TEST
FOR
REPS.
6.07
.05
1.94
.52
F
TEST
FOR
VAR.
5.91
2.44
10.35
46.93
f-i
STANDARD
ERROR
8.69
1.37
1.56
.61
STANDARD
ERROR
OF
THE
MEAN
5.02
.79
.90
.35
C.V.
l:
(S/MEAN)*100
7.20
3.83
6.39
.38
C.V.
2:
(S
OF
MEAN/MEAN)*100
4.16
2.21
3.69
.
22
LSD
(0.05)
14.71
2.31
2.64
1.04
PLANTED:
04-12-88
HARVESTED:
07-22-88
p»)
/^f
(*»
mi
TABLE
2
1988
IRRIGATED
SPRING
TRITICALE
VARIETY
TRIAL
-
SARC
-
VARIETY
YIELD
TESTWT
PLANTHT
HEAD
CWT/A
LB/BU
INCHES
DATE
TRITJUAN
JUAN
43.02
52.37
39.67
164.00
VT08246A
VT082464
41.90
51.23
37.33
167.00
TRITKRAM
KRAMER
41.62
49.20
35.33
161.00
CI
17430
NEWANA
40.89
59.40
32.33
165.00
VT082478
VT082478
40.31
46.53
39.33
166.00
TRITKARL
KARL
40.22
51.70
29.50
159.00
m
TR81T211
FOSTER
40.21
52.20
31.33
164.00
TRITWELS
WELSH
40.14
51.00
40.00
161.00
TR83T103
FOSTER
39.48
51.50
29.67
16^.00
m
TRITMARV
MARVAL
38.47
'48.17
41.
33
161.00
TRITCARM
CARMAN
36.54
49.63
36.67
160.00
TRITWHIT
WHITMAN
30.22
45.40
36.33
170.00
VT086497
VT086497*
22.12
43.13
25.33
1—1
VT086085
VT086085*
18.43
43.67
27.33
STATISTICAL
TABLE:
EXPERIMENTAL
MEANS
36.68
49.65
34.39
m
TOTAL
OBSERVATIONS
42.00
42.00
42.00
NO.
OF
REPLICATIONS
3.00
3.00 3.00
NO.
OF
VARIETIES
14.00
14.00
14.00
m
REP.
MEAN
SQUARE
.75
3.30
1.41
VAR.
MEAN
SQUARE
174.84
52.93
78.94
ERROR
MEAN
SQUARE
11.18
2.58
1.53
ERROR
DEGREES
OF
FREEDOM
26.00
26.00
26.00
m
F
TEST
FOR
REPS.
.07
1.28
.92
F
TEST
FOR
VAR.
15.63
20.48
51.73
STANDARD
ERROR
3.34
1.61
1.24
m
STANDARD
ERROR
OF
THE
MEAN
1.93
.93
.71
C.V.
1:
(S/MEAN)*100
9.12
3.24
3.59
C.V.
2:
(S
OF
MEAN/MEAN)*100
5.26
1.87
2.07
LSD
(0.05)
5.61
2.70
2.07
*Yarieties
never
completely
headed
out
m
PLANTED:
04-13-88
HARVESTED:
07-29-88
/"JO
TABLE
3
1988
DRYLAND
SOFT
WHITE
WINTER
WHEAT
TRIAL
SARC,
HUNTLEY
VARIETY
YIELD
TESTWT
PLANTHT
HEAD
CWT/A
LB/BU
INCHES
DATE
DUSTY
SOFT
WHITE
12.49
57.00
20.33
150.67
OVESON
SOFT
WHITE
12.20
53.47
20.67
149.33
REDWIN
HARD
RED
(CI
1784A)
11.59
58.97
23.33
150.00
HILL81
SOFT
WHITE
11.46
54.57
23.67
152.00
WHITMAN
TRITICALE
11.37
43.77
29.00
144.00
STEPHENS
SOFT
WHITE
11.07
51.17
18.67
148.67
WA7166
SOFT
WHITE
10.88
52.77
19.00
149.00
TIBER
HARD
RED
(MT
8003)
10.80
58.20
25.33
150.00
t—F
FLORIDA201
TRITICALE
10.24
47.33
32.00
143.67
MALCOLM
SOFT
WHITE
10.07
52.93
23.00
148.33
DAWS
SOFT
WHITE
9.81
54.37
19.00
151.67
r-1
NUGAINES
SOFT
WHITE
9.77
48.13
18.33
151.67
NEELEY
HARD
RED
(CI17860)
9.44
56.70
21.33
150.33
CASHUP
SOFT
WHITE
9.41
52.17
18.67
151.00
JOHN
SOFT
WHITE
9.00
58.77
21.67
151.67
JUAN
TRITICALE
8.68
44.70
29.67
143.67
WA7163
SOFT
WHITE
8.63
53.43
20.67
149.67
LEWJAIN
SOFT
WHITE
7.66
55.87
17.67
152.33
BASIN
SOFT
WHITE
7.00
57.77
15.33
150.67
(=1
FLORA
TRITICALE
5.93
42.50
20.33
146.67
STATISTICAL
TABLE:
EXPERIMENTAL
MEANS
9.87
52.73
21.88
149.25
TOTAL
OBSERVATIONS
60.00
60.00
60.00
60.00
NO.
OF
REPLICATIONS
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
NO.
OF
VARIETIES
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
REP.
MEAN
SQUARE
1.94
49.85
5.22
5.15
VAR.
MEAN
SQUARE
8.89
76.43
55.38
22.42
ERROR
MEAN
SQUARE
5.69
15.11
5.51
.66
ERROR
DEGREES
OF
FREEDOM
38.00
38.00
38.00
38.00
F
TEST
FOR
REPS.
.34
3.30
.95
7.82
F
TEST
FOR
VAR.
1.56
5.06
10.04
34.03
STANDARD
ERROR
2.39
3.89
2.35
.81
STANDARD
ERROR
OF
THE
MEAN
1.38
2.24
1.36
.47
C.V.
1:
(S/MEAN)*100
24.16
7.37
10.73
.54
C.V.
2:
(S
OF
MEAN/MEAN)*100
13.95
4.26
6.20
.31
LSD
(0.05)
3.94
6.42
3.88
1.34
PLANTED;
09-28-87
HARVESTED:
07-07-88
TABLE
4
.
1987-68
WINTER
BARLEY
YIELD
TRIAL
-SARC-HUNTLEY-
1*1
VARIETY
"rocky
WINTER
WHEAT
KAMIAK
BOYER
SCHUYLER
SCIO
IGRI
SPRINTER
MAL
YIELD
TESTWT
PLANTHT
HEAD
CWT/A
LB/BU
INCHES
DATE
15.80
10.12
8.91
8.89
6.95
6.68
5.36
3.35
54.75
28.50
147.00
38.43
25.00
141.67
36.33
21.75
144.33
36.73
21.00
149.00
35.80
22.00
143.00
40.83
22.25
143.67
33.60
20.50
150.33
31.00
20.50
150.00
STATISTICAL
TABLE:
EXPERIMENTAL
MEANS
TOTAL
OBSERVATIONS
NO.
OF
REPLICATIONS
NO.
OF
VARIETIES
REP.
MEAN
SQUARE
VAR.
MEAN
SQUARE
ERROR
MEAN
SQUARE
ERROR
DEGREES
OF
FREEDOM
F
TEST
FOR
REPS.
F
TEST
FOR
VAR.
STANDARD
ERROR
STANDARD
ERROR
OF
THE
MEAN
C.V.
l:
(S/MEAN)*100
C.V.
2:
(S
OF
MEAN/MEAN)*100
LSD
(0.05)
32.00
32.00
32.00
24.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
11.79
1.27
3.12
26.38
55.89
208.50
30.34
34.57
2.69
.71
1.20
3.71
21.00
21.00
21.00
14.00
4.38
1.80
2.61
7.11
20.77
294.72
25.36
9.32
1.64
.84
1.09
1.93
.82
.42
.55
1.11
19.86
2.19
4.82
1.32
9.93
1.09
2.41
.76
2.41
1.24
1.61
3.37
f"T
PLANTED:
09-25-87
HARVESTED:
07-07-88
f-i
