
(*1
PROJECT
TITLE:
Winter
and
spring
wheat
variety
performance
evaluation
under
northern
Montana
conditions
on
the
basis
of
production
value
as
influenced
by
protein.
Ilr
GRC
2
P-F
PERSONNEL:
Project
Leader
Cooperators:
Gregg
R.
Carlson
-
Havre
-
Agronomist
Jim
Christianson
-
Great
Falls
-
MWDC
Mark
Schutt
-
Great
Palls
-
MWDC
G.
A.
Taylor
-
Oozeman
-
Breeder
(WW)
L.
E.
Talbert
-
Oozeman
-
Geneticist
(SW)
S.
P.
Lanning
-
Dozeman
-
Technician
(SW)
Individual
Cooperating
Landowners
OBJECTIVES:
f-F
p-i
It
is
the
objective
of
this
project
to
bring
quality
and
quantity
together
to
allow
the
forces
of
market
value
to
influence
evaluation
of
winter
and
spring
wheat
varieties
under
varying
cropping
conditions
in
northern
Montana.
SL^IARY:
Producers
are
well
aware
of
the
impact
protein
premiums
can
have
on
overall
market
value.
"Winning
with
quality'
or
"losing
without
it'
becomes
a
game
of
timing
which
is
not
always
an
unlimited
option
to
the
average
producer.
Producers
have
asked
researchers
to
put
recommended
practices
into
dollars
and
cents.
Such
is
never
easy;
and
this
effort
toward
quantifying
wheat
variety
performance
on
the
basis
of
total
dollar
return
is
no
exception.
The
Research
Center
had
yield
and
protein
performance
data
by
year
back
to
1982
for
numerous
locations
throughout
northern
Montana.
A
system
needed
to
be
developed
to
marry
historic
price
information
to
corresponding
agronomic
performance
for
overall
evaluation.
Upon
advice
sought
from
Jim
Christianson
of
the
Montana
Wheat
and
Barley
Committee
it
was
determined
that
market
price
values
used
for
evaluating
a
given
actual
yield
and
corresponding
protein
level
for
varieties
in
given
data
years
needed
to
be
based
on
average
annual
prices.
The
Committee
had
the
price
information
needed,
but
it
was
In
the
form
of
some
12,000
individual
pencil
entries
for
seven
years
from
1982-1987.
A
computerized
database
was
needed
to
include
the
some
38,000
values
involved
when
protein
premiums
by
quarter
were
considered.
As
the
Committee
was
already
in
the
initial
phases
of
computerizing
the
database,
the
research
center
prepared
a
temporary
computer
database
for
pilot
use
early
in
1988

f-*
Ilr
GRC
2
utilizing
only
Wednesday
markets
toward
calculating
annual
averages.
Portland
values
were
used
to
eliminate confusing
variability
associated
with
freight
rates
at
different
points
of
origin.
The
"average
of
Wednesdays'
database
was
used
in
1980
to
prepare
some
preliminary
graphics
featuring
1902-1907
data
for
producer
reviews.
Oy
December,
1900
Mark
Schutt,
Information
Officer
for
MWDC
had
developed
a
spreadsheet
program
utility
affording
much
more
efficient
computerization
of
market
data.
Thus,
daily
market
spreadsheets
are
now
being
prepared
for
all
years
available.
By
the
time
this
report
was
prepared,
the
years
1906-1900
had
been
made
available
to
the
research
center.
Thus,
the
present
analyses
feature
annual
market
values
per
year
based
on
daily
market
quotes
for
1906-
1900;
and
on
Wednesday
market
quotes
for
1902-1905.
(-1
For
these
preliminary
location
analyses,
an
average
market
value
per
acre
by
actual
yield
at
ordinary
protein
was
calculated
for
each
entry
along
with
added
market
value
for
protein
premium,
if
any.
The
sum
of
the
two
values
then
represents
the
gross
return
per
acre.
The
values
were
tested
via
simple
analysis
of
variance
with
data
years
as
replications.
RESULTS:
Preliminary results
are
shown
graphically
in
Figures
1-10
representing
the
:
following
location
data:
Fig.
Crop
Location
#
Varieties
#
Yt
n
1
Flw-WW
Havre
6
6
»la
Flw-WW
Havre
6
5
2
Flw-WW
Dig
Sandy
6
6
n
»2a
Flw-WW
Dig
Sandy
7
5
3
Flw-WW
North
Havre
4
3
4
Flw-SW
Havre
5
7
*4a
Flw-SW
Havre
6
4
5
Rcp-SW
Havre
5
5
6
Flw-SW
North
Havre
5
6
7
Rcp-SW
North
Havre
5
4
0
Rcp-SW
North
Joplin
5
5
9
Flw-SW
Turner
5
6
10
Flw-SW
North
Dodson
5
5
♦Denotes
graphs
representing
a
reduced
number
of
years
for
purposes
of
including
pertinent
new
releases
for
which
data
does
not
exist
for
all
years
since
1902.
1-1
The
research
center
would
appreciate
any
comments
on
this
approach
to
wheat
variety
performance
evaluation.
It
must
be
kept
in
mind
that
nitrogen
p-i

voY
Ilr
GRC
2
fertility
can
dramatically
affect
such
results.
Soil
nutrient
information
is
available
for
these
data
(applied
N,
P,
K
for
1902-1905,
and
soil
nutrient
analysis
plus
applied
N,
P,
K
for
1906-1900).
All
Havre
data
represents
a
minimum
^applied
nitrogen'
rate
of
70
pounds
N.
Management
can
further
affect
overall
crop
yield
and
quality
performance;
and
shrewd
marketing
skills
will
not
limit
the
progressive
manager
to
average
annual
market
values.
FUTURE
PLANS:
The
research
center
plans
to
continue
work
with
MWDC
and
wheat
breeders
in
further
developing
and
refining
the
use
of
these
data
with
agricultural
^
producers.
First,
the
database
must
be
updated
to
include
"daily'
market
values
for
1902-1905.
Then,
regression
or
other
more
sophisticated
means
of
anlysis
needs
to
be
introduced
In
work
with
these
data.

Figure
1
.
Gross
Return
-
Fallow
Winter
Wheat
($
Yield
at
10
%
Protein
+
Premium)
Northern
Ag
Research
Center,
Havre
$/Acre
Preliminary
Data
MSU/AEe/NAOC
Havn
IMt'
Yield
$'s
Protein
Premium
$'s
LSD,
Gross
Rtn
-
$
19.71/ac
$154.07
$135.57
Red
win
n
Cree
Cneyenre
Norwin
6-Yr
Mean
(1982-1988)^
$147.05
Norstar
•1066
Nursery
Loet
to
Drought
Conditions
Basis
-
Ave.
Annual
Mkt.,
Portland
Deliv
Figure
la.
Gross
Return
-
Fallow
Winter
Wheat
($
Yield
at
10
%
Protein
+
Premium)
Northern
Ag
Research
Center,
Havre
$/Acre
$143.61
Preliminary
Data
MCU/AEe/NAnC
Havn
Yield
$'S
Protein
Premium
$'s
LSD,
Gross
Rtn
■
$
16.63/ac
$161.51
$
$137.43
150.31
$149.04
fi
edwln
Neely
5-Yr
Mean
(1983-1988)*
$132.Vi
Judith
Norstar
•1065
Nursery
Loet
to
Drought
Conditions
Basis
■
Ave.
Annual
Mkt.,
Pcxtlarid
Deliv

Figure
2.
Gross
Return
-
Fallow
Winter
Wheat
($
Yield
at
10
%
Protein
+
Pfemlum)
Myers
Farms
inc.,
Big
Sandy
$/Aore
$200
r
$158.17
$160
-
$100
-
$50
-
$0
Tiber
Preliminary
Data
M8U/AE6/NARO-Havi«
N\\\N
Yield
$'s
BB
Protein
Premium
$'s
LSD,
Gross
Rtn
■
$
13.46/ac
$149.25
$146.92
$144.00
$130.60
$134.43
i
Redwin
Ore©
Rocky
Norwin
Norstar
6"Yr
Mean
(1983-1988)
Basis
•
Ave.
Annual
Mkt.,
Hortland
Oellv
Figure
2a.
Gross
Return
-
Fallow
Winter
Wheat
($
Yield
at
10
%
Protein
♦
Premium)
Myers
Farms
Inc.,
Big
Sandy
$150
r
$100
-
$/Aore
$121.61
Yield
$'s
BB
Protein
Premium
$'s
LSD,
Gross
Rtn
•
$
23.68/ao
$114.49
$114.33
$120.36
$103.24
$102.69
$96.87
$50
-
Tiber
Preliminary
Data
MS
U/AE6/NAAO-H««ra
Redwin
Oree
Rooky
Norwin
Norstar
Judith
3-Yr
Mean
(1986-1988)
Basis
-
Ave.
Annual
Mkt.,
Hortland
Ueliv

r-1
Figure
3.
Gross
Return
-
Fallow
Winter
Wheat
($
Yield
at
10
%
Protein
*
Premium)
Peterson
Grain
&
Cattle,
North
Havre
$200
$150
-
$100
$50
-
$/Acre
$0
Yield
$'s
BB
Protein
Premium
$'s
LSD,
Gross
Rtn
•
$
26.7&/ac
$U3.Q1
$145.09
$124.0
$128.16
Tiber
Preliminary
Data
M8U/AE&/NAR0-Havi*
Hedwin
Norwin
Norstar
3-Yr
Mean
(1983,1984.1988)
Basis
•
Ave.
Annual
Mkt.,
Portland
Deliv

Figure
4.
Gross
Return
-
Fallow
Spring
Wheat
($
Yield
at
13
%
Protein
+
Premium)
Northern
Ag
Research
Center,
Havre
$/Aore
^U7.26
Yield
$'a
Protein
Premium
S's
LSD,
Gross
Rtn
«
$
14.24/00
$157.66
A
^^•3r.2Q
$156.13
$135.52
Glenman
Preliminary
Data
USU/AE6/NAflO-Hrrra
Ne»vana
Pondera
7-Yr
Mean
(1982-1988)
Fortuna
Basis
-
Ave.
Annual
Mkt.,
Portland
Deiiv
Figure
4a.
Gross
Return
-
Fallow
Spring
Wheat
($
Yield
at
13
%
Protein
+
Premium)
Northern
Ag
Research
Center,
Havre
Yield
$'s
Protein
Premium
$'s
$/Acre
LSD,
Gross
Rtn
-
$
16.07/ac
$106.77
$112.59
$111.84
$111.87
$90.77
$00.15
Glenman
Newane
Pondera
Fortune
Ml
6402
Preliminary
Data
W6U/AE&
/NAAO-Hvvi*
4-Yr
Mean
(1985-1988)
Basis
■
Ave.
Annual
Mkl.,
Pcytiand
Deliv

Figure
5
//Z.
Gross
Return
-
Recrop
Spring
Wheat
($
Yield
at
13
%
Protein
*
Premium)
Northern
Ag
Research
Center,
Havre
$/Acre
$123.29
Glenman
Preliminary
Data
U6U/AE6/KARO-Havn
Yield
$'s
Protein
Premium
$'s
LSD,
Gross
Rtn
■
$
15.67/ao
$10R.a9
$10R.64
$104.18
Newana
Pondere
5-Yr
Mean
(1983-1987)
$63.21
Fortune
Baals
•
Ave.
Annual
Mkt.,
Horttand
Uellv
Figure
6.
G.ross
Return
-
Fallow
Spring
Wheat
($
Yield
at
13
%
Protein
+
Premium)
Peterson
Grain
&
Cattle,
North
Havre
M
Yield
S's
Protein
Premium
$'s
$/Acre
$134.41
LSD,
Gross
Rtn
•
$
15.71/ac
$128.43
$118.79
$121.88
$112.11
Glenman
Preiiminary
Data
U6U/AE£/NARO-Hv«rr«
Ne^^na
Pondere
Fortune
6-Yr
Mean
(1983-1988)
Basis
■
Ave.
Annual
Mk!.,
Portland
Dellv

Figure
7.
Gross
Return
-
Recrop
Spring
Wheat
($
Yield
at
13
%
Protein
*
Premium)
Peterson
Grain
&
Cattle,
North
Havre
$/Acre
$G2,63
Yield
$'s
Protein
Premium
$'s
LSD,
Gross
Rtn
■
$
21.45/ac
$92.8
$68.77
$05.12
$70.77
Gienman
Preliminary
Data
M6U/AE6/NARO-Ktvf«
Newena
Ponde.'-e
4-Yr
Mean
(1984-1987)
Fortune
Basis
•
Ave,
Annual
tv4kt„
Portland
Oelfv
Figure
0.
Gross
Return
-
Recrop
Spring
Wheat
($
Yield
at
13
%
Protein
+
Premium)
Russ
Tempel
Farm,
North
Joplln
$/Aore
$113.74
Yield
$'s
Protein
Premium
$'s
LSD,
Gross
Rtn
-
$
16.59/ac
$106.38
$108.45
$95.74
Gienman
Preliminary
Data
W6U\AE6\NAnO-
H«vr*
Newana
Pondere
Fortune
5-Yr
Mean
(1983-1987)
Basis
-
Ave.
Annual
Mkt.,
Portland
De.'iv

pn
pn
Figure
9.
Gross
Return
-
Fallow
Spring
Wheat
($
Yield
at
13
%
Protein
♦
Premium)
Leon
Cederberg
Farm,
Turner
$/Acre
$126
r
N\VM
Yield
$'s
fl
B
Protein
Premium
$'s
LSD,
Gross
Rtn
-
$
11.4
7/ac
$75,591
$92.56
$83.22
$79.16
$73.82
Qlenman
Preliminary
Data
MSU/AECi/NARO-H«vn
Newana
Lew
Pondera
Fortune
6-Yr
Mean
(1983-1988)
Basis
•
Ai/e.
Annual
Mkt.,
Portland
Deliv
Figure
10.
Gross
Return
-
Fallow
Spring
Wheat
($
Yield
at
13
%
Protein
♦
Premium)
Harold
Solberg
Farm.
North
Dodson
$/Aore
$125
r
$96.87
$100
-
$75
-
$50
-
$25
$0
Gienman
Preliminary
Data
M6U/AE6/NARO-H«vra
hNWN
Yield
$'s
IB
Protein
Premium
$'s
LSD,
Gross
Rfn
«
$
12.93/ac
$91.62
$66
$69
.58
.07
$83.25
i
Newana
Lew
Pondera
Fortune
5-Yr
Mean
(1984-1988)
Basis
■
Avp.
Annual
Mkt.,
Pcx'tland
Dellv