MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY · SOUTHERN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER · AGRONOMY PROGRAM

Montana Dryland Winter Wheat Planting Outlook

A field-based look at moisture, planting timing, and fall establishment conditions.

Developed as an Extension decision-support resource using public weather, soil, historical climate, and field information.

Field conditions first · supporting data when you want itFull maps · model values · historical context · diagnostics · methods
Fresh build
VIEW
Step 1 · Choose your field and planting dateMap on the left · field checks on the rightNo field selected
STEP 1 · SELECT YOUR FIELDSTEP 1 · YOUR FIELD

Pin your field and see field-specific planting conditions.

Search an address, city or ZIP, then zoom to the exact field. Add field checks only if you know them.

START WITH YOUR FIELD

Pin your field location to see today’s conditions, mapped soil, and planting-date tradeoffs.

Search by address, city or ZIP. The map switches to satellite view so you can zoom in and place the pin on the correct field.

FIND YOUR AREASearch by Montana street address, city, ZIP code, or latitude/longitude.After a match, the weather colors turn off and satellite imagery opens for precise field selection. Pan/zoom, then click the exact field.
Choose the map layer & dateSwitch among seed-zone water, profile water, soil temperature, and fall thermal opportunity.−
Dec 15 horizon
Loading data…14-day window rolls forward daily
For planting:Select a parameter above to see its planting meaning.
ACTIVE MAPSeed-zone moistureToday
FIELD LOCATIONSearch an address/city/ZIP or click the map to zoom closer.At a close field view, click once to place the field pin.
FIND & PIN YOUR FIELDSearch address/city/ZIP above · satellite mode opens automatically · zoom/pan · click exact field to pin.
Map parameter detailsDrag anywhere on this header · use −/+ to collapse or expand
Loading regional weather fields…
Regional weather screening surface; zooming improves field-location precision but does not increase weather-model resolution. Hover for coordinates/value. Gold teardrop = selected field. Basemap: Esri World Imagery.
YOUR FIELD TODAYToday's conditions & mapped soil profileModeled weather is context; SSURGO is mapped soil information. Verify actual seed-row moisture in the field.
Today at this fieldPin a field to see today's conditions and planting checks.
Soil profile & water-holding capacityPin a field to load USDA SSURGO horizons, mapped soil series/component, and available-water capacity.
OPTIONAL · WATER-LIMITED YIELD SCENARIOS

Water-limited yield scenarios

Uses your field-measured moist profile depth plus historical May–July precipitation to show dry, typical, and wet planning ranges. These are not yield forecasts.

MSU CWP · 4.2 bu/ac/in
Pin a field to calculate mapped profile capacity.Enter the field-measured moist profile depth in Your Field Information above to calculate the three water-limited planning ranges.
Long-range precipitation signalPin a field to load the ECMWF EC46 + SEAS5 ensemble-mean winter/early-spring precipitation context.
Curious how these scenarios are calculated? Data, method & references

Stored water: mapped SSURGO available-water capacity is integrated only through the probe/moist-depth you enter, up to 60 in. Future precipitation: Daymet 1991–2020 May 1–July 31 precipitation provides dry/normal/wet historical ranges, matching the precipitation window used in the MSU publication. Yield: stored water + scenario precipitation is multiplied by the MSU winter-wheat crop water productivity of 4.2 bu/ac/in. The ECMWF EC46 + SEAS5 ensemble mean is shown only as a long-range wet/dry planning signal; it does not replace the historical scenario ranges. NOAA CPC 90-day precipitation outlooks are an independent official cross-check and are not blended into the numeric scenarios.

Important: precipitation is not the same as crop water use. Runoff, evaporation, snow redistribution, soil recharge, fertility, weeds, disease, variety, winter injury and management can all reduce realized yield. These values are water-limited planning scenarios, not predicted yields.

MSU Extension · Water Productivity of Montana Crops (MT202204AG) ↗ · NOAA CPC seasonal precipitation outlooks ↗

Pin a field to continue.The planting date defaults to today. Unverified field checks can remain marked “Not checked,” but the outlook will keep them visible as unresolved.
How Was This Map Made? Data, Interpolation, Sources & Limitations
See supporting dataSee the data evidenceOpen the plots and model values only if you want the technical detail.Open the charts, today’s model values and the detailed mapped soil profile.+
SUPPORTING DATASTEP 3 · SUPPORTING FIELD EVIDENCE

See the weather trend, model values, and mapped soil.

These details explain the field outlook. They do not replace your field check.

TODAY'S MODELED BASELINEStarting state for future-date comparisons
Pin a field to see the current safety gate and best next action.
Pin a Montana field to load the selected-coordinate forecast and nearby observed context.
MAPPED SOIL PROFILEUSDA SSURGO context at the pinned coordinate
USDA soil-survey information will load after a field is pinned.
TODAY’S CONDITIONSSTEP 2 · YOUR FIELD TODAY

What do today’s conditions mean for your planting plan?What do conditions mean for your planting date?

Start with the short field message and your soil. Open the data only if you want to see why.Start with three separate checks: planting safety, whether the stand can start, and how much fall thermal development opportunity remains.

Select a date
Choose a Montana field below to start.The map is only the location input until a field is selected.
Today’s model snapshotSelect a field to load today’s values.
Know your soilMapped soil information will appear after a field is selected.
Show detailed evidence + data qualityOpen all six model/weather indicators, establishment-runway context, provenance and quality-control checks.View evidence ↓
Evidence for this dateSix model / weather indicators + data quality
Interpretation first; raw values remain secondary.
Select a field, then choose a planting date.
Data quality & technical checksRecent water response, forecast agreement and research-only diagnostics
Recent water validationPin a field to compare the last 7 days of modeled precipitation with modeled soil-water response.
STEP 2 · YOUR PLANTING DATE IN CONTEXTSTEP 4 · NEARBY PLANTING DATES

Your planting date in contextHow do the conditions change around your planting date?

First see how this date compares with 30 years of history. Then see the simple water-versus-fall-growth tradeoff of moving earlier or later.Compare nearby dates. A different date may help one condition while making another less favorable.

Select a field and intended date.The 14-day comparison will appear here.
What changes if you plant earlier or later?Seed-zone water shows wetter/drier model direction. Thermal opportunity shows how much fall heat remains.+
Read two rows:Seed-zone water — blue/larger = wetter model; orange/smaller = drier. Check actual seed-depth moisture. Fall thermal opportunity — larger purple = more remaining GDD for fall growth; waiting usually reduces it.
Select a field and planting date to load the Planting Window Finder.
30-year contextSelect a field and intended planting date.
How to use this date comparisonUse it only if you can move planting a few days earlier or later.

Planting earlier: only consider it if the field is ready and moisture is adequate at the planned seed depth.

Planting later: modeled moisture may improve, but remaining fall thermal opportunity decreases.

Look at the tradeoff: one date can help one condition and hurt another.

Before changing plans: check seed-depth moisture, the local forecast, green bridge risk and how much thermal development opportunity remains.

If no nearby date clearly improves the tradeoff, your intended date may still be the most practical choice.Use this as field context, not a guarantee. Also consider field access, residue, forecast uncertainty and your own field experience.
STEP 3 · PLANTING ADJUSTMENTSSTEP 5 · PLANTING ADJUSTMENTS

Adjust planting to what you find in the field.Adjust the setup to the seedbed you actually find.

Review or update the field checks here. Changes are used immediately in the planting setup.Use the field condition you see at planting. Do not change the drill setup from the map alone.

ACTIONABLE
Use the seedbed you actually find.Your earlier field check carries forward here. The map alone should not change seeding depth or rate.
Your field check will appear here.Enter it once beside the map; edit only if the field condition changes.
Pin a field and complete the field check to see the matching setup guidance.
Full planting-adjustment guide & referencesOpen the detailed seed-depth, seed-rate, placement, residue, fertility, and seed-treatment guidance with source links.Open guide ↓
For planting:Use the column that matches what you actually find at seed depth. Do not change seeding depth or rate from the map alone.
How these management categories were developed
These are tool-created field-management classes, not published named categories. Dry, marginal and favorable conditions come from field checks at intended seed depth; the Wuest–Lutcher water-potential values remain literature context only. Deeper Moisture Confirmed requires an actual field check and follows MSU depth guidance. Wuest & Lutcher ↗ MSU Guide ↗
Management AdjustmentCompare across planting conditions Dry / Dust-InProtect establishment Deeper Moisture ConfirmedReach moisture carefully Favorable SeedbedUse the standard setup
Category Dry / powdery at intended seed depthLiterature context: increasingly incomplete germination near/below about −1.6 MPa.Wuest & Lutcher ↗ Normal seed zone dry; usable moisture confirmed deeperRequires a field check—do not infer moisture depth from the map.MSU ↗ Moist at intended seed depthLiterature context: rapid germination above about −1.1 MPa.Wuest & Lutcher ↗
Seed depth1–2 inDust-in if the fall window is closing; do not automatically chase absent moisture.MSU ↗Only as deep as needed; ≤3 inConfirm moisture first.MSU ↗1–2 in into moistureMSU ↗
Cultivar / emergenceLocally adapted cultivarStandard emergence ability at normal depth.Favor proven deep-emergence / longer-coleoptile abilityRht8 is not required.Agronomy Journal ↗Locally adapted cultivar
Seed rate0.7–0.9 M PLS/ac baselineDo not increase for dryness alone.MSU ↗Start with baselineIncrease only for delayed planting or expected stand loss.MSU ↗0.7–0.9 M PLS/ac15–21 seeds/ft² dryland baseline.MSU ↗
Seed-row fertilizerBe conservative10 lb/ac N + K₂O is a starting safe rate; dry/coarse soil may require less.MSU Soil Fertility ↗Be conservative at depthUse the same starting-safe concept; actual safety depends on soil and opener geometry.MSU Soil Fertility ↗10 lb/ac N + K₂O starting safe rateAdjust for soil, moisture, opener width and row spacing.MSU Soil Fertility ↗
Seed treatmentStrongly considerDry-seed-decay protection is finite.MSU ↗Recommended as appropriateMatch product to labeled disease risk.MSU ↗Match seed and field disease riskMSU ↗
Equipment / drillVerify penetration + seed–soil contactHard, dry soil may require setup changes; extra packing cannot replace moisture.Nebraska Extension ↗Hoe / deep-furrow opener may helpSlow down, verify actual soil cover, and keep Montana placement ≤3 in.Standard calibrated setupMaintain uniform 1–2 in placement and good seed–soil contact.
Main cautionEmergence may depend on subsequent rainfallDo not mistake a dry model screen for a measured field condition.Deep placement can delay or reduce emergenceAgronomy Journal ↗Favorable moisture does not remove WSMV, crusting or profitability risk
Thresholds & Technical ReferenceOpen only when you want the benchmark numbers and source details.
MetricHow to read itKey benchmarkSource
Seed-zone water · 0–4 inGFS VWC is model context only. The grower field check at intended seed depth is the primary germination-water evidence.Literature context: > −1.1 MPa rapid germination; −1.1 to −1.6 MPa slower/marginal. The tool does not derive field ψ from GFS + SSURGO.Wuest & Lutcher 2013 ↗
Soil temperature · 0–4 inWithin the published range, warmer soil generally speeds emergence.41–68°F (5–20°C): controlled emergence-response range used for context; outside it, no score is extrapolated.Lafond & Fowler 1989 ↗
Conditional thermal emergence windowMSU air-temperature GDD reference is shown independently of model VWC; moisture must be field-confirmed before interpreting it as emergence expectation.257–320°F-d, base 32°F. For future dates it remains a thermal reference until field moisture is checked.MSU GDD MontGuide ↗
Fall thermal opportunityRemaining base-32°F GDD from after a candidate planting date through Dec. 15. More GDD means more temperature-driven development opportunity, not automatically a better planting date.Use with field moisture, WSMV timing and seedbed condition. Dec. 15 is a fixed late-fall comparison endpoint, not a biological dormancy date. Published GDD bands are temperature references, not predicted field stages.MSU GDD MontGuide ↗
How to interpret the thermal number<257°F-d median: limited thermal opportunity relative to the published lower emergence reference. 257–335: median reaches emergence reference. 336–695: median reaches the lower two-leaf reference. ≥696: median reaches the lower first-tiller reference.These are thermal-reference crossings only. Actual development requires moisture and successful establishment; late or dormant seeding can still establish later.MSU GDD MontGuide ↗
MSU Wheat Production Guide ↗
Emergence thermal contextCompares remaining base-32°F thermal opportunity with the MSU 257–320°F-d emergence reference. The statewide map shows the median margin above or below the 257°F-d lower reference.Temperature only. This does not predict emergence or crop stage. Moisture, seeding depth, crusting and seed vigor are not included; two-leaf and first-tiller references remain provisional for fall-planted winter wheat.MSU GDD MontGuide ↗
Profile water reserve (0–39 in)+ = modeled storage gain vs today; − = modeled storage loss.Reserve/rooting context after emergence; not the germination trigger and not field-measured PAW.Lollato et al. 2016 ↗
7-day atmospheric moisture balance (P − ET₀)+ = precipitation exceeds reference ET₀; − = atmospheric demand exceeds precipitation.Context only—not soil recharge, crop ET, runoff, drainage or soil-water change.FAO-56 ↗
Wheat streak mosaic timingAvoid early planting and remove the green bridge; field conditions override the calendar.General MSU guide: plant after Sep 5 north, Sep 15 central, Sep 20 southeast; kill volunteer cereals/grassy hosts 2–3 weeks before planting. Select a field and date for local status.MSU Cereal Viruses ↗
MSU WSMV IPM ↗
Why Dec. 15? It is a fixed late-fall comparison horizon so every candidate date is evaluated to the same endpoint. It is not a dormancy date. The tool no longer turns MSU's roughly 4–6 weeks of fall growth into a grower-facing cutoff using an unvalidated 40°F endpoint. MSU Wheat Production Guide ↗
Fall wheat development · quick field guideGermination → emergence → leaves → tillering. Morphology reference only; not a predicted stage.Open quick guide
Use representative plants. Count fully unfolded leaves and tillers separately; dig plants when seed placement, roots, coleoptile or crown position matters.
Guide only. Select a field and planting date to highlight the conditional thermal references.
Field-staging notes & published references
1Sample representative plants
2Dig plants when needed
3Count unfolded leaves
4Count tillers separately

Use of outside-Montana guides: morphology and staging concepts only. Montana management recommendations continue to use MSU/Great Plains sources.

Technical documentation: equations, methods, data sources & citations
Data sources & provenance
Validation status & uncertainty
References & acronyms
MORE HELP

Montana State University resources

Open the topic you need next.

Live data diagnostics
Not run yet.